In my line of work, I have to prove that someone is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in order for a jury or judge to find said individual guilty of having committed an act. In the court of public opinion, the burden of proof is significantly different. If one has been accused, usually regardless of the source's credibility, they must be guilty. Any denial by the "guilty" party merely means that they are trying to cover up, or are unwilling to accept responsibility for, their actions. I'm soooooo tired of hearing about the HGH accusations in baseball (did he or didn't he/they?). I'm really tired of it because the media and whoever else is involved (govt. getting too big here people?) are digging up dirt on things that weren't illegal at the time the acts were committed. Seriously, if it were legal to be a professional ping pong player from 2000 to 2003, and all of a sudden that profession were outlawed in 2004, then why on earth should we care in 2008 if someone were a professional ping pong player in 2002? Which brings me to Kelvin Sampson. I LOVE college basketball and I love watching good teams play great games (that rarely happens in the NDA with or without Shaq or Kobe. Oh, NDA= No Defense Association.) ;) Kelvin Sampson put together some pretty good teams in the Sooner state and has had a good measure of success in his second year here in the Hoosier State. However, he (and/or his staff) broke NCAA rules while in Oklahoma and the NCAA invoked additional limitations on him when he was hired at IU-Bloomington. These are/were limitations that other schools didn't have to live under. Side note: It's kinda like being on probation. A court says that while on probation you can't go to a bar or drink or break laws, even if you could otherwise legally enter said bar or drink selected adult beverage. Probation is a person's chance for the court to give them a break and if they can't handle it, for the court to then throw the person in jail (as one retired judge put it). So, it has been alleged that Sampson may have violated the NCAA's terms of "probation" (my word, not theirs) while at IU. The court of public opinion (In the midwest, this court's jury seems to be made up of IU's BIG 10 rivals) seems to believe that Sampson is in fact guilty. So what of it? Imagine you're Kelvin Sampson, you've been making the big-money coaching Div. I college basketball for years and it appears that that is about to come to an end. What do you do? Maybe a high school or NAIA program would hire him until he could again be back in Div. I. Or maybe you go manage a Panera Bread franchise somewhere, perhaps? Nah. From the news I've heard, the alleged violations all have primarily involved use of the telephone in the recruiting race. Up next for Sampson? Some sort of sales job involving the phone. Maybe he'll be hawking financial planning for Ameriprise, or maybe he'll be working inside sales for Dell. Who knows? But wouldn't that just make sense? ;) Peace. |